Kindergarten Teachers’ Effects on Five Year-Olds’ Futures

I never went to preschool. I also missed being in kindergarten when I went to a Pittsburgh (PA) elementary school in the early 1940s. It was my loss.

Why a loss? Because there is much evidence–both quantitative and qualitative–that what five year-olds learn in kindergarten when strong ties exist between them and their  teachers produce short- and long-term effects (e.g., cognitive gains, social behaviors, and psychological benefits) that last into adulthood.  In the past few decades, educational researchers and social scientists have fastened upon metrics that seemingly prove that  such outcomes have occurred (see here and here).

More recently, economists have gotten on board with their algorithms and cost-benefit analyses and found that preschool and early childhood school experiences did, indeed, have long-term effects on adult earnings, getting married, raising families, and daily behavior in the community. See here, here, and here. Because economists have accrued outsized influence on U.S. policies in health care, education, government operations, and other sectors, their cost-benefit analyses have helped in building political coalitions supporting investments in early childhood education, especially for low-income families.

But you do not need social scientists to tell parents or early childhood educators that kindergarten helps all children build mind, body, emotional strengths, and lifetime habits. For decades, preschool and kindergarten teachers have believed that such effects lasted beyond preschool into elementary and secondary grades. Middle class parents also.

Remember Robert Fulgrum’s best seller, All I Really Need To Know I Learned in Kindergarten?  Although critics have called the collection of short essays trite and sugary, the book  has sold over seven million books since 1988 and continues to sell well a quarter-century later. The part about kindergarten sums up what so many Americans still believe are core values and behaviors learned in families and school.

Share everything.
Play Fair.
Don’t hit people.
Put things back where you found them.
Clean up your own mess.
Don’t take things that aren’t yours.
Say you’re sorry when you hurt somebody.

Sure, these behaviors are learned in families first and then in preschool and kindergarten. Academics call these learned behaviors socialization . Five year-olds learn how to behave in groups in the next dozen years as students and as adults later.  Ah, but trying to get metrics to capture these all-important learned behaviors  still remain beyond the reach of current social scientists including economists.

If Fulgrum’s platitudes annoy social scientists and educational researchers, few ever  ask adults about their memories of those early years in school. Even fewer researchers listen to those parents who remember well their kindergarten teachers–experiences at least three to four decades earlier. But all of that has now changed with the foot-to-the-pedal, standards-based school reform since the early 1980s. Those reforms have altered the character of kindergartens.

Kindergartens today have become academic boot camps for first grade. Much time is spent on getting children to read, learn arithmetic and getting tested.There are now pre- and post-tests for reading and math, most often timed to get supposedly accurate measurements. And Common Core standards for kindergarten are yet to be implemented with more of the same academic concentration.

kdg

Many teachers and parents have complained about the loss of play-time and children choosing activities. As standards-based testing and accountability have seized three-to-five year-olds, parents and teachers have noted increases in thumb-sucking and bed-wetting. In short, top-down pressures to teach academics to young children has reshaped the relationship between early childhood teachers and young children in negative ways (see here and here).

So test-driven policies using easily quantifiable measures have indeed influenced how kindergarten teachers practice by squeezing students to achieve academically and, in doing so, has eroded the all-important teacher-child relationship, one that remains central to what five year-olds learn and practice for years to come.

And here is the rub. Policymakers have largely ignored the teacher-child relationship–arguing that they are more concerned with tangible outcomes not how teachers teach or children learn. As for researchers, they have been of little help since they have a hard time identifying metrics that capture the quality of that child-teacher relationship and its links to socializing children and subsequent academic and non-academic effects  on adult behavior. Without quantitative measures to capture the impact of the   teacher-child  relationship, policymakers skip over it and grab at what can be reduced to numbers; that all-important relationship is missing-in-action when policymakers make decisions. And that is unfortunate.

In the current climate of test-driven standards and coercive accountability, policymakers and researchers depend far too much upon test scores and not whether what is measured captures the cognitive and social-psychological habits young children acquire and the all-important relationship they have with their teachers. If there are no measures, then these important outcomes do not exist.

________

Thanks to Susan Ohanian for finding the above cartoon

About these ads

23 Comments

Filed under how teachers teach, preschool, Reforming schools

23 responses to “Kindergarten Teachers’ Effects on Five Year-Olds’ Futures

  1. Pingback: Kindergarten Teachers' Effects on Five Year-Old...

  2. Pingback: Kindergarten Teachers’ Effects on Five Year-Olds’ Futures | Kids Code Academy

  3. Pingback: De verschoolsing en ontscholing-paradox van deze tijd en de Heckman-curve | X, Y of Einstein?

  4. Pingback: Kindergarten Teachers' Effects on Five Year-Old...

  5. Kw

    I just had a discussion with a reading specialist who blithely informed me that pretend play wasn’t a literacy activity, so she had removed the pretend play areas from the Kindergarteners’ guided reading rotation. That is simply untrue, there is good evidence that pretend play, because it involves storytelling and sequencing, is a component of early literacy. When even educators are pressuring “skills” over other components of learning, how can we possibly reverse this trend of removing anything perceived as soft from the classroom? Why this obsessive assumption that children are behind and must be caught up so they can read ASAP? Who does it benefit?

  6. Pingback: #schooltips Behaving in Class | School Tips

  7. EB

    Even in the massively overcrowded kindergarten classrooms of the ’50′s and ’60′s, children could learn to be comfortable in an environment other than their families, and to operate according to expectations that were new and different. Those are life skills that every child needs. Far more valuable than getting a head start on reading.

  8. Pingback: Why Learning to Read Early is Crucial for Young Children | The Tale of Piggy Packfat

  9. Great post. The only thing I’d like to add is that some kids aren’t ready emotionally to go to preschool or even kindergarten and to add the academic pressure on top of the immaturity is a double whammy.

  10. Linda

    I work in a k thru 5 school. I tutor kindergarten students. I work with the low of the lowest kids, they don’t know their alphabet letters by sight,counting to 10 is a big deal. Some of my kids don’t know their shapes or colors. How are these kids going to take these standardized tests. The educational system is setting them up for faillure. I live in Las Vegas and when these kids get old enough to drop out,the job on the strip that pays $10.00/hour looks pretty good.

  11. Pingback: Check Out Scoop.it « Mrs. Poulin's Blog

  12. This reminded me of something I wrote in the Times Educational Supplement over a year ago, and the similarity is simply too potent to ignore. About the UK I wrote, “…we have a substantial group of children in our society for whom school is in no sense a meaningful option. What they need, we don’t yet have. And every day that we waste, failing to appreciate this harsh truth, is a day that our wider, healthier society and culture contracts further.” At the time, the UK’s chief inspector of schools wrote a response the following week, telling me I was wrong.

    This week, his boss has made headlines in the UK calling for the most disadvantaged children to go to school… aged two.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-24818439

    • larrycuban

      No public official has gone that far in the U.S., at least that I know of, in recommending that formal schooling start for low-income toddlers, Joe. Thanks for sending the link.

  13. Pingback: OTR Links 11/07/2013 | doug --- off the record

  14. Pingback: Why promote creativity? | The Life-long Learner

  15. One of the most important things that we have in out lives is our relationships. Taking away that special bond that young learners have with their teachers is a terribly thing to do to anyones development. I can understand that we need to prepare our students for a demanding future but that should start with the basics. Teachers in general are under tremendous accountability and pressure to get students to achieve academically, do we now need to push this at such a young age? We will never be able to measure nurturing , love and support but we need these things in order to survive and be successful. We are going to raise a generation of children who are academically intelligent but socially inept. That can only lead to problems outside of the education relam and into sustaining life and happiness.

    • larrycuban

      Thank you, Andrea, for taking the time to comment on the academic pressure that kindergartners feel at this moment in school reform.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s