The splash began in 2012 when Massive Open Online Courses were touted as the coming revolution in higher education.
Wait, Larry, that was only five years ago, a mere blip in the life-cycle of an educational innovation. Why are you including MOOCs when you have featured posts asking “whatever happened to” half-century old innovations such as Open Classrooms, Total Quality Management, and Behavioral Objectives?
With advances in digital technology and social media, the life cycle of a “disruptive innovation,” or a “revolutionary” program has so sped up that what used to take decades to stick or slip away now occurs in the metaphorical blink of the eye. So whatever happened to MOOCs?
Where Did the Idea Originate?
One answer is that MOOCs are the next stage of what began as correspondence courses in the late 19th century for those Americans who wanted to expand their knowledge and found going to college was next to impossible. From home-delivered lessons to professors on television delivering lectures to online courses since the early aughts, MOOCs evolved from the DNA of correspondence courses.
Another answer is that in 2001, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology opened up its list of courses for anyone to take online at no cost. Through Open Courseware, professors’ syllabi, assignments and videotaped lectures were made available to everyone with an Internet connection.
And a third answer is that in 2008, two Canadian professors George Seimens and Stephen Downes who offered a course through the University of Manitoba creating the first officially labeled MOOC called “Connectivism and Connected Knowledge” from a regular class they taught for 25 students to over 2200 off-campus adults and students for free who had Internet-connected computers.
All three answers suggest that the lineage of MOOCs has a history located in higher education seeking to educate students who lacked access to college and universities.
What erupted in 2012 was a lava flow of MOOCs from elite U.S. universities accompanied by hyperbolic language and promises for the future of higher education becoming open to anyone with a laptop. Since 2012, that hype cycle has dipped into the Trough of Disillusionment and only now edging upward on the Slope of Enlightment. Verbal restraint and tamed predictions of slow growth, smart adaptations, and commercial specialization have become the order of the day. And, fortunately, a humility about the spread and staying power of innovations initially hyped o steroids. All in five years.
What is a MOOC?
Taught by experts in the field, a Massive Open Online Course in higher education is accessible and free to anyone with an Internet connection. College students, those who work and are not registered in a college or university, and others who simply want information about a topic in which they are interested take courses. See a brief video made at the beginning of the MOOC innovation that explains what they are.
What Problems Did MOOCs Intend to Solve?
Limited accessibility to knowledge and skills offered in higher education. High cost of going to universities. MOOCs offer broader accessibility to students who because of geography, age, cost, and having a family could not take courses. Now anyone with a computer can learn what they wanted to learn. MOOCs are, as one reporter put it: “Laptop U.”
Do MOOCs Work?
Depends upon what someone means by “work.” Since the usual measures of “success” in taking courses are attendance, grades, test scores, and similar outcomes, only one of these familiar measures has been applied to MOOCs: how many students completed the course? Attrition has been very high. About ten percent of enrolled students in the early years of MOOCs did all of the assignments, communicated with course assistants, and took the final exam. Sorting out claims of “success” amid sky-high attrition rates has been an issue for both champions and skeptics of the innovation See here, here, here, and here)
What Happened to MOOCs?
They are still around but strikingly downsized and in the middle of being monetized and re-directed. The initial cheerleaders for MOOCs such as Sebastian Thrun, Daphne Koller, and Andrew Ng formed companies (e.g., Udacity, Coursera) that either stumbled badly, and subsequently altered their business plan. Many of these founders also departed for greener pastures (see here, here, and here).
MOOCs persist but as in the case of so many other hyped innovations using new technologies, a slimmer, more tempered, and corporate version exists in 2017 awarding certificates and micro-credentials (see here and here).
14 responses to “Whatever Happened To MOOCs?”
I think the big problem with MOOCs was that they were free. It is really easy to quit a course you didn’t pay for. With some skin in the game you are way more likely to finish.
Thanks for the comment, Doug.
Reblogged this on From experience to meaning….
Pedro, thanks for re-blogging post.
wow. Thanks for the trip down memory lane and the link to that timeline offered by Audrey Waters. I was directly involved in evaluating the arts education television broadcasts created for distribution from an airplane flying over midwestern states.
They failed because they were misconceived, assuming that the human teacher could be replaced, either by expositive media (Thrun) or a social network (Seimens and Downes).
I wrote “MOOCs and other edtech bubbles” in December 2012 (https://edtechnow.net/2012/12/29/moocs-and-other-ed-tech-bubbles/) and took part in the Online Educa Berlin debate in December 2013, proposing the motion that “MOOCs are doomed” (https://oeb-insights.com/the-oeb-debate-2013/) with Gianpietro Petriglieri from INSEAD. The motion was defeated almost unanimously – probably about 200 to 3.
But we were right.
Thank you for your comment, Crispin, and link to your 2012 post.
Unfortunately, folks usually talk about innovation only with respect to new technologies. Some old ideas would be innovative if they were actually done thoroughly and systemically… like integrated equitable schools: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/want-innovation-how-about-integrated-equitable-schools_us_59c67048e4b08d66155042dc
Thank you your comment, Arthur, and the link to the piece you did.
Reblogged this on kadir kozan.
I appreciate your re-blogging post.
Pingback: I Love You but You Didn’t Do the Reading | I Love You but You're Going to Hell
Pingback: Weekly Links & Thoughts #147 | meshedsociety.com
Pingback: The MOOC-ness Monster: 21st Century Education’s Latest Craze – Scholar Escolar