Nichole Dobo, a reporter, writes about blended learning. Most of her 10-year career as a journalist has focused on education. This post appeared on October 15, 2014. The Hechinger Institute is a nonprofit, independent news website focused on inequality and innovation in education
Teacher Valyncia O. Hawkins knew she needed extra time with students who arrived in her classroom behind grade level, but slowing down the whole class risked boring the more advanced students. But even after 20 years as a teacher, Hawkins still didn’t have a good method to keep everyone moving forward. The 21 children in her classroom at Anne Beers Elementary School shared the label of fifth grader, but they arrived with different needs. It was clear she was losing some of them. It was disheartening.
“When I would stand and talk they would be bouncing off the walls,” Hawkins recalled.
Convinced there had to be a better way, this D.C. Public Schools Teacher took a fellowship with the CityBridge Foundation in 2013 to research and develop a new teaching method. She traveled to see other schools in states such as California and New Jersey, and she noticed technology offered a solution. It inspired her to create a new method of instruction. And in the process she found her zeal for teaching returned.
Today, she is no longer standing in front of the room for a whole class period, trying to keep everyone on the same page. She developed a new style of teaching that gives students a mix of technology and small-group instruction. Online tools, most of them free, helped her customize lessons for students. She periodically checks progress through the year to adjust.
“I am meeting them where they are,” she said.
That’s not to say she found a method that is easier. It requires a lot of advance planning. She must craft several lesson plans for one class period.
On a recent day, when students arrived the first task was correcting the punctuation on two sentences projected on a smart board. Everyone gathered at the front of the room, composition books in hand, and they got to work fixing run-ons. They had four minutes to do it. Hawkins knew some students would move quicker, and her new teaching method meant she was prepared for it.
After answering correctly, students grabbed laptop computers and got to work on more challenging problems provided by online lessons that allowed them to work at their own pace.
This allowed Hawkins to work with students who took longer to arrive at the right answer.
“After we add a period is the ‘I’ lowercase?” Hawkins asked the smaller group who remained.
“No,” a student responded, a few moments later.
“Right, it is capitalized because you are always important,” Hawkins said.
A blended learning classroom gives children a mix of online and in-person instruction, and some say it offers more personalized learning. There are many ways teachers can do it, but Hawkins created something that is her own model. There is a lot of movement in her classroom, with many students breaking off to work on lessons at their own pace after the starting the class together. Groups of desks offer places for children to gather to work on laptops. A small couch near the front allows for comfy seating for small group-instruction at a smart board. Singular desks in corners welcome children who seek solitude while they work.
The children are often allowed a measure of independence. For instance, they can choose from several vocabulary lessons. They can wear headphones. Or not.
Student JaNaia Jackson, 10, said her favorite lessons in English are finding the theme and main idea, she said. She notices that some of her peers like to take the computers off and work quietly on their own. Others like to stay near each other. There are other perks, such as getting to write with a tool that is preferred over a pencil and paper.
“I love to type,” she said. “I just love to work on typing.”
Right now, Hawkins is the only educator using this model of teaching in her school. In other D.C. schools, the district is coordinating blended-learning experiments.
Hawkins has noticed students are more engaged and there are fewer behavioral issues, something other D.C. educators said they have noticed with this model of instruction. The novelty of the technology isn’t the only factor, Hawkins said. Personalized instruction that allows students some freedom to explore keeps them from getting bored or frustrated.
“It just helped me feel like I was contributing to the learning of the students,” Hawkins said. “It helped address those students who don’t necessarily follow the norms.”
That’s not to say the transition was easy or the results perfect. Hawkins considers her classroom a work in progress. She continues to remodel it to fit the needs of the school day and her students.
This year, for example, she had to re-organize her blended classroom because she now teaches English language arts to all fifth graders in the school. Before, she taught multiple subjects to the same 20 students all day. The new schedule means she has more students, so she is customizing plans for about 63 children who transition in and out of her room for English class. The new schedule has also shortened the class-time window. (That’s not to say there is less time for English and language arts at the school — writing instruction is now included across other subjects, such as science class.)
Another challenge: Managing the multiple online platforms, such as quizzes, learning games and online grade reporting for parents. Data on the websites she uses aren’t connected so Hawkins has to juggle them to monitor how her students are progressing.
But those obstacles haven’t sent Hawkins back to the familiar way of teaching. She continues to find a way to navigate, and it often means finding low-cost, or free, help.
Volunteer students from Georgetown University spend time in her classroom as aides to help with things like transitions between the groups and the inevitable technical issue, such as a misplaced log in for a computer. And plastic milk crates Hawkins snagged in the cafeteria are the perfect size for storing student folders that organize personalized learning materials. To organize online resources, she puts links on a free website that she’s used for the classroom for a long time. Students are in one of five groups based on their ability level. Each group has a “playlist” of lessons. They access it in the classroom, and it’s available at home for the students who have Internet access.
On Tuesday, most students worked independently on computers in the classroom to answer a question about the class word of the day, “persistence.” Meanwhile, Hawkins stood in front of about 10 students with the word projected on a smart board. The students were asked to define the word. They wrote in composition books, pencils in hand and dictionaries by their side.
Hawkins challenged students to explain how the word “persistence” was subtly different than the examples they were giving, which would better fit the word “repetition.” She called the entire classes’ attention, including the faster-moving students who had been working independently. They had a joint class discussion, and together everyone arrived at the answer.
“Even though you know there is trouble ahead you have persistence,” Hawkins said.
14 responses to “After 20 years, a Teacher Reinvents Her Classroom Using Technology (Nichole Dobo)”
I really enjoyed this post. It shows how a teacher can take challenges in the classroom and create new and innovative techniques. Although I am hesitant about too much use of technology in the classroom, I am impressed by this system and the teacher’s dedication to it. I am curious whether or not this system would work in other areas of the country or in other types of schools, but I know that it would take a lot of time and money to find out these answers.
Should work if teacher believes that it can and has access to devices, software, and technical help. Thanks for the comment.
Larry, so much of your writing has been critical of the use of technology in the classroom. Is there something in this post that is changing your view of technology in the classroom? If so, can you provide more detail?
Thanks for the comment, Mary. If you look through my many posts on the use of new devices and software in classrooms, you will find a number of them that describe teachers like Valyncia Hawkins who have thoroughly integrated the hard- and software into daily lessons. After all, the point of these high-tech tools is to help teachers do what want to do in reaching their objectives and getting students to learn. But so much of the rhetoric about new technologies going back to the early 1980s mirrors the hype of every single device going back to the film projector. So I am (and have been) a skeptic of the rhetoric (“revolutionary,” transformative”). I am also (and have been) critical–which is part of being skeptical–of the decision-making process that has been so common when it comes to “new technologies.” Policymakers buy and deploy the devices and teachers are expected to use the hardware and software with nary a say-so in the entire process.Finally, as I have written many times, putting new technologies into classrooms is often unquestioned by voters and taxpayers who seldom inspect the claims that policymakers make for the device and software.
So when I come across instances of teachers who have figured out, often on their own, how to use the devices and software to advance their lessons, I want to post such examples on my blog.
It’s so refreshing to see a teacher who can successfully integrate technology in a way that isn’t distracting and is actually productive in the classroom. So many times, even in higher education, professors and teachers have so much trouble working with technology, so much so that it becomes a distraction and a running joke between their students. Hawkins is a great example – and a hopeful one at that – of how technology can be used well and effectively to reach students – how it was meant to be used.
Thank you for your comment.
Reblogged this on Bryan Mann.
Thanks for re-blogging post on teacher’s classroom, Bryan.
Thank you for sharing my story with your readers.
You are welcome.
I’m curious of how Valyncia O. Hawkins manages to keep students on task while on such devices. Even in college, I see students on laptops surfing the internet, facebook, or even doing work for other courses, so it’s hard to imagine 5th graders with so much self-discipline. I think a lot of teachers can use her tip well in various situations.
You can write Ms. Hawkins and ask her the direct question. Thanks for the comment.
Reblogged this on Cynthia Ambrose and commented:
I really enjoyed this posting as well. This is not about creating a “technology rich” environment, but rather about using technology to individualize in a way not possible before we had these tools!
Thank you, Cynthia, for re-blogging Nichole Dobo’s post on the teaching using technology.