Darryl Yong is a professor of mathematics at Harvey Mudd College in Claremont (CA). For the entire PDF, see rtx121001408pDarry Yong
During the 2009–2010 academic year I did something unusual for a university mathematician on sabbatical: I taught high school mathematics in a large urban school district. This might not be so strange except that my school does not have a teacher preparation program and only graduates a few students per year who intend to be teachers.
Why did I do this? I, like many of you, am deeply concerned about mathematics education and I wanted to see what a typical high school in my city is like. Because I regularly work with high school mathematics teachers, I wanted to experience the life of a high school teacher for myself. I had neither a research project nor an agenda for changing schools or teachers.
I kept a blog during my adventure, but it took some months after that experience before I could begin to process all that had happened. Four lessons emerged from my experience that I hope will give college and university educators a clearer view of what teaching high school mathematics is like.
Before we get to those four lessons, some background information might help. First, you should know that my story is not going to turn out like Stand and Deliver, Dangerous Minds, or any other inspirational Hollywood movie about a teacher who helped students achieve great things through painful sacrifice and struggle. The Hollywood idealization of a teacher as a martyr who sacrifices her personal life for the sake of her students propagates unrealistic and unhealthy expectations. Teaching is hard, but it shouldn’t have to be that hard.
This is also not the story of a professor coming down from his ivory tower and becoming outraged by the horrors of how children are taught in schools. I find these narratives unproductive.
This article conveys one person’s perceptions of the struggles that novice teachers face in one school and discusses what the general public rarely hears about public education.
I applied for teaching positions just like other teachers in my district, though I did not take all of the necessary steps to become credentialed.
Visiting Faculty Permits, which were authorized between 2007 and 2013 through California Senate Bill 859 by Senator Jack Scott, gave me a convenient way to teach in the California public school system without a credential.
I was hired at a school that serves about 1,100 students. It is one of three high schools in a working-class neighborhood. Roughly 40 percent of the students at this high school are English language learners, 80 percent qualify for free or reduced meals, 85 percent identify as Hispanic or Latino.
In 2009 only 3 percent of students at this school were deemed proficient on the Algebra 1 California Standards Test (CST). That year, I taught Algebra 1, Algebra 2, Geometry, and a math intervention class (an additional period of mathematics for students who are struggling in mathematics). Even though I taught four different classes, I did not teach a full load (six classes at this school). One of my Algebra 1 classes was an inclusion class—half of those students had learning disabilities or some other reason to warrant having an Individualized Education Program (IEP). In that class, all students, with IEPs or without, learned math together….
In many respects I got what I wanted that year: an authentic experience of teaching in a high need urban school. I didn’t want to teach calculus or teach only “gifted” students. I didn’t want to receive any concessions because of my qualifications.
My experience was closer to that of a new high school teacher with no prior experience than that of a seasoned educator moving from one institution to another. I had to cut my teeth on many things like a rookie teacher. For example, I had to learn how to avoid taking things that students said or did to me personally. I learned that my students’ behaviors in class were often a result of grave personal issues (violence, gangs, fear of deportation, etc.). I made many mistakes that year, but I was also spared many more mistakes because of trusted friends who are or were high school math teachers.
Lesson 1: Schools Are Complex Systems Involving People, Culture, and Policies
The news is full of stories about how our school systems are failing along with accompanying claimed explanations. There is a lot of blame that goes around, even at schools. I have heard some university mathematicians blame high school teachers for the poor preparation of their students. At this high school, I heard teachers blaming elementary school teachers for the poor preparation of their students.
During my short high school teaching experience, I learned that most explanations for why our schools are failing are simplistic and inadequate.
For example, consider this frequently cited reason for our underperforming schools: bad teachers. We need to “hold teachers accountable” and “get rid of the bad teachers”. I have yet to meet a teacher who willingly wants to be an ineffective instructor—every teacher I know has a desire to do a good job. Of course, I met math teachers at my school who didn’t know their subject area as well as they should have. Nevertheless, the idea that we can simply replace “bad teachers” with enthusiastic new ones ignores the reality that years of hard work and experience are required to become an effective teacher. In addition, our schools and districts are not doing enough to help teachers grow in their content knowledge and teaching practice.
Some place blame on bad school administrators. In my opinion, our high school was poorly run, but our administrators didn’t always have the resources to do their job well. Our administration mostly reacted to events and crises instead of implementing sensible practices. There was very little feedback given to us teachers about our teaching.
In fact, over the entire year I had an administrator in my classroom observing me for a total of about ninety seconds. I received no meaningful feedback on my teaching. But it’s difficult to blame him when you consider how understaffed the school was. Because the school lacked a counselor at the beginning of that school year, the assistant principal had to take on those responsibilities while supervising students during breaks, dealing with disciplinary issues, communicating with parents, and putting out fires.
Some people have asked me whether it was difficult to teach in a school with lots of poor families who didn’t care about education. Not only is that stereotype inaccurate, it represents another line of reasoning that is simplistic. During that year I encountered some families who didn’t seem to care about their kids’ education and many that did. Sometimes when I called a student’s home I would get a parent who was involved and would intervene, sometimes not. I encountered one young woman who returned to high school as a senior after having taken some time off to care for her baby. Unfortunately, right at the end of the school year, this woman’s mother stopped offering to take care of her baby and she had to quit school.
Does that mean her family didn’t care about education? I don’t think we can tell. I think the best we can say is that each student is a person whose attitudes and capacity for learning is greatly shaped by past and present circumstances.
Simplistic diagnoses are dangerous because they encourage quick fixes. Instead of long-term plans for systemic change, school reform becomes a series of short-lived fads that cause teachers to become jaded by unfulfilled promises of improvement.
At my high school, la mode du jour was project-based learning (PBL). All teachers were trained in PBL (oh, how schools love acronyms) and required to design and implement one project for a class that year. The potential benefits of authentic problems that engage students in meaningful thinking and help them to develop useful life skills are great, but the program was not implemented wholeheartedly. When I talked to one of my colleagues at this school a year later, I found out that PBL was no longer being practiced schoolwide. How can we expect to see meaningful improvement when we change from one fad to another every few years? The unfortunate truth is that the work of improving schools is long, arduous,and not at all sexy….
Lesson 2. Student Self-Concept Is the Best Explanatory Variable for Student Success
I have won teaching awards at the institutions where I’ve worked, but I intentionally held low expectations for my effectiveness as a high school teacher. Even so, I felt depressingly ineffective as a teacher most of that year. While it’s not wise to generalize from a single case, my experience shows that having strong content knowledge in one’s field is a necessary but insufficient condition for student learning to take place.
In the education research literature there are some econometric studies that attempt to measure how different variables (district spending per student, parents’ education level, past academic performance, training of teacher, students’ socioeconomic status, etc.) correlate with student achievement. So, which variables matter most?
According to John Hattie, the variable that correlates most strongly with student achievement is student self-concept. This is a very robust finding. His amazing book  synthesizes over 800 meta-analytic research papers on education (thereby covering over 15,000 journal articles!) to determine the variables that most strongly correlate with student achievement.
Self-concept is a person’s concept of “self” in a particular domain. The difference between self-esteem and self-concept is that the former is an overall view of oneself, whereas self-concept is domain specific. For example, I see myself as a successful learner of mathematics but a pretty poor painter and basketball player. The vast majority of people in our country have a low math self concept—many almost see it as a badge of honor to be bad at math….
Self-concept is shaped by prior academic achievement and one’s beliefs about who has access to mathematical skill and what it means to be “good” at mathematics. During this year I repeatedly observed that my attempts to make learning engaging (by using fun activities, putting mathematics in contexts that students could relate to, making connections to prior learning) were helpful, but not nearly as helpful as attending to students’ self-concepts as learners of mathematics.
If a student’s self-concept is based on past academic achievement and future performance correlates strongly with self-concept, how can we break this cycle? I learned that, regardless of how “tough” some students are or how weak their math skills are, teenagers still love feeling successful when they become good at something or when they figure something out. A sequence of small successes can lead students to develop intrinsic motivation to learn and take risks in a classroom. One way to stage these sequences of successes is through minute, detailed, careful scaffolding of mathematics content….
Lesson 3. Teaching Is a Far Less Respected Profession Than It Should Be
Many parents of school-age children will tell you their kids’ teachers are great but that “bad teachers” are part of the reason why the school system as a whole is failing. To me, this is one of many indicators of the level of respect that we afford teachers and teaching as a profession. In my opinion, discussions about teacher compensation just scratch the surface. I believe that the deeper issue is that our society, including some people in the school system, doesn’t see teaching as a growth oriented, intellectually demanding career deserving of our nation’s best and brightest individuals.
Teachers receive messages every day about how much they are valued as professionals. The way students and parents talked to teachers at our school, the process of signing in and out of work every day, down to the inconvenience of not being given a key to the school office (where the copier was) were examples of such messages. But the most disturbing messages came from the weekly professional development meetings that all teachers had to attend…..
Only rarely did I leave one of these weekly professional development meetings feeling invigorated. These were usually meetings in which teachers shared information about the students that we had in common or when the mathematics department met together without an administrator present. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these professional development meetings made me feel as if I had been babysat for an hour. And many of my teacher friends tell me that my experience is not unique….
Lesson 4. It’s Not the Written Curriculum That Matters, It’s the Assessed Curriculum
Many university mathematicians who take an interest in mathematics education tend to focus on mathematics curricula. For instance, university mathematicians feature prominently in debates about reform versus traditional textbooks that fuel the “math wars”. Perhaps the reason for this interest is that textbooks give us an easy way to join conversations about mathematics education.
Each of us learned mathematics as children, so feel we have something to contribute to the choice and design of math textbooks. Unfortunately, most of us university mathematicians are very different from the majority of students in our nation who have to study mathematics in high school. I, too, am interested in mathematics curricula and was excited to teach a range of classes and to use both reform and traditional curricula. However, at the beginning of that year I greatly overestimated the impact of textbooks on student learning.
The word “curriculum” has various meanings. The intended curriculum comprises state, district, and school standards that dictate what students are supposed to learn and when they are to learn it and, to some extent, how they are to learn it. The new Common Core State Standards are an example of this. Written curricula are the textbooks that schools and districts choose for teachers, but since teachers vary greatly in their adherence to and usage of textbooks, it is important that we pay attention to the curriculum that they enact. All of these lead to the attained curriculum, a construct for what students actually learn.
And then there’s the assessed curriculum. I knew little about this concept before my adventure started, but by the end of the school year I became keenly aware of it. Because we live in an era of accountability and standardized testing, my state and district use various assessments to measure how much students have learned. In a perfect world, the intended curriculum would align with the written and assessed curricula, but in practice they often do not agree. When this happens, teachers find themselves in the awkward position of having to decide how to sacrifice one set of learning intentions for another.
My principal was enthusiastic about a reform Algebra 1 curriculum. I was impressed by many wonderful features of this curriculum and wanted to follow it faithfully, but it did not align with our district’s periodic assessments. For example, there was a moment during that year when I had to decide whether to teach my students how to blindly follow a recipe to use the quadratic formula (since they weren’t yet ready to understand the derivation of that formula) or continue along the path set by our textbook and let them get all of those questions on the periodic assessment wrong. I chose the former and to this day still feel horrible about that decision. Over time I found my teaching becoming increasing aligned with the assessed curriculum: I reorganized the sequence of topics in this reform curriculum and altered how certain topics were introduced or emphasized. This led to a rather weak implementation of the written curriculum and a less coherent Algebra 1 course.
I believe that assessment is crucial to knowing whether students are learning and whether the strategies that schools and districts employ are working. However, we need to remember that these assessments enforce standards for student learning more powerfully than written curricula.
While that may not be a bad thing, thoughtful, well-aligned assessments tend to be expensive and labor intensive (both to develop and to grade). And the likelihood of creating and implementing these kinds of assessments is low given the severe financial condition of most states and districts….
29 responses to “Math Professor Teaches High School Classes (Darryl Yong)”
Pingback: Math Professor Teaches High School Classes (Darryl Yong) @Larrycuban | A New Society, a new education! | Scoop.it
Pingback: Math Professor Teaches High School Classes (Darryl Yong) @Larrycuban « juandon. Innovación y conocimiento
Thank you for this even-handed and thoughtful explanation of a year in schools. I plan to share it with my preservice teachers. The choices made regarding curricula seem to fit Professor Cuban’s definition of a dilemma. I wonder how teachers are prepared to manage such curriculum dilemmas, and if enough attention is given to such deliberation in teacher preparation programs and/or professional development workshops.
When we prepared social studies teachers–I team-taught our social studies Curriculum and Instruction course with a high school teacher–we made sure that our novice teachers knew what a dilemma was and assured them that they would face many in teaching full-time. I cannot say for sure whether it helped those hundreds that we taught over 10 years but, according to the many who we stayed in touch with, the concept remained active in their minds and was a practical tool in their daily work.
I must agree with Christy, this is a great article. As a community college instructor, I see fresh out of high school students every year. I was really struck by the comments on assessment vs curriculum, and the “self-concept”, as well as the respect given to teachers. There are many folks at both the state and federal level, who NEED to read this article. Education is not going to be fixed by a new program every other year.
Thanks for the comment, Kurt
Great article. Thanks for taking the time to “see how the other half lives”. Your willingness to share your experience is a professional development experience all by itself.
Thanks, Frank, for taking the time to comment. I need to make clear, however, that Darryl Yong a professor at Harvey Mudd College in Claremont (CA) wrote the piece, not I.
Thanks for passing this along. It is a great piece and needs to be seen by as many people as possible. However, as evidenced by the confusion of commenters, you post it in a manner that makes it appear that it is your own writing. When you are excerpting a piece, you should really limit it to a small amount of the text and encourage others to view the entire piece at its actual location.
I also linked to this article – which is difficult to do since the only link I was able to find was of a PDF of the document and not a website or blog post. However, I hope you update your post to more explicitly make it clear that this is Professor Yong’s work. Use blockquotes or limit how much you excerpt (or make explicitly clear that your are excerpting).
Thanks for the comment and suggestions, Tom.
Thank you sharing this story, Larry (and thanks to my colleague, Kurt, for passing it along). I am quite struck by your comments about the misalignment of expectations and assessments. One of my English students just talked to me after our class about our college’s placement test and how little it has to do with what she had learned prior to taking it and what she has learned since. I’m thankful I don’t feel pressure to consider that test when I plan my classes, though I agree with her about the disconnect and have worked with others on improving placement. Still, that is little consolation to a student who is trying to efficiently navigate the educational system in the hopes of one day becoming a leader within it. I’m going to share this article with my teacher-prep students; I’m sure it will spark an energetic discussion.
Thanks for the comment, Jacqui, and the story of your student. I do hope you share it with your students. I need to make clear, however,that the post is reprinted from an article written by Darryl Yong, a professor of mathematics at Harvey Mudd College in Claremont.
I loved this article. I’m neither a math teacher nor in an American school, but so much of what Darryl Yong talks about is true for most teachers. We are suffering from policy fatigue in the Ontario school system and like the school he was working in, what was in fashion one year may be forgotten the next. We flip from one idea to the next: differentiated instruction, balanced literacy, critical thinking, the sexiness of anything that is computer based. He’s right, of course, about the problems with the school system being complex and I would say, not easily fixable. Standardized testing improves nothing and creates a culture of teaching to the test. Most kids in high school are only interested in their marks-who is to blame for that other than a system that emphasizes measurable achievement and doesn’t really care about real learning.
The discussion about self-concept is very true but again how is this remedied in a system that only looks at results?
Finally, I have taught for 36 years, 24 of which were full time. I have been evaluated about 6 times. The reality is that we are left alone to our own devices and only judged by our results or by the number of complaints that parents or students level against us. A school system that really cared about “good” teachers would and should have a more effective way of helping, training, judging and for lack of a better word, fixing teachers.
Thanks so much, Cathy, for your comments on Darryl Yong’s one year experience in a high school and how your many years of experience in Ontario intersected.
Pingback: Lessons learned – by a maths professor teaching in secondary education | Ostrakinda
Hi Larry and Daryl, This post is one of the best I’ve read. Really. Do you mind if I reblog it in December? I’ve never pushed the “reblog” button, so I’m not sure what happens – I’ll make sure you get the credit :).
I just finished a series on Math Problem Solving, so this article is timely as well as excellent.
This was an excellent piece.
Thank you for taking a year of your life and sharing your insights. It makes a difference.
Thanks, John, for the comment. Darryl Yong spent the year in a high school and recounted what he had learned. He did all of us a favor in the example he set for other professors and writing of his experiences.
The first piece I’ve seen in quite a while that acknowledges the complexities of teaching within today’s constraints. Thanks to Darryl giving a year of his work and for reflecting so deeply, and thanks to Professor Cuban for sharing it!
Jennifer, thanks for taking the time to comment.
I see similarities between your experience and mine. I am a career-changer in social studies, and could recommend a broad number of reforms–both large and small–that might serve to improve our educational process. The problems are complex, multi-dimensional, and driven by a wide variety of players.
Your comment is directed to Professor Darryl Yong. Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Too often the connections among curriculum, instruction and assessment get glossed over. Practitioners seem to focus on just one of the three. For example, only recently, while involved in a discussion with colleagues (which I joined late) there was firm agreement on the assertion that ‘assessment drives instruction.’ (As an aside, I should point out that after 30 years of professional practice I have mostly learned when to hold my tongue; generally learned how to pick my battles so my decision to take on the group was not a hasty one) As the latecomer I figured it would be fun to just dive right in with a contrary view, so I did. The group remained mostly unmoved and, of course, I remained the outsirer. Not surprising since the group was mainly people involved in provincial testing (I’m from Canada). My assertion: assessment does not drive instruction. That view is much too simplistic. It may be more correct to say that the three–curriculum, instruction and assessment–need to be seen as vital and equal. Rather than one driving the other two it might be better to view the three as ‘dancing’ together. …or maybe to view the interchange as any one impacting all three. As professionals, perhaps we all need to become more attuned to the differences that exist between all three and, in so doing, perhaps become better at allowing the three to interact in harmony. In other words, let’s try and bring the curriculum developers, the instructional developers and the assessment experts out of their silos and to the same table when we discuss educational policy, rather than relying on just one, depending on the decision-makers’ biases.
Thanks, Maurice, for the comment. I agree that bringing curriculum, instruction, and assessment out of their silos ought to occur. That would, indeed, be preferable. The rub is that policymakers do believe that “assessment drives instruction” and, given the goals of those policymakers, getting students ready for college and career–at least in U.S.–it is more effective to alter how teachers teach by having tests and holding teachers and students accountable for results. Should it be that way? No. But it is. Question: how best to change policymaker beliefs and actions?
My first response is “Change the Policymakers” but, of course that’s nonsense. :>) The fact is, you have asked a very important, difficult question and, so, the answers are likely not to be simple at all. Here’s my best effort: collective and individual efforts to change the minds and hearts of the many we have in the system; colleagues, teachers, parents and, hopefully students. This can be done through means such as this, publications and public sound-offs. Of course we are talking about something that will only happen in the long term, Let’s hope it does.
Thanks, Maurice, for replying to my question.
Pingback: Top 10 Posts of 2012 |
Pingback: Educational Policy Information