For the past few years, U.S. policymakers and pundits have conducted a love affair with the Finnish education system. This not the first time that policy elites have looked abroad for ways of transforming U.S. schools into jet-powered engines promoting economic growth. Remember how Japanese schools (and later Singapore and Korea) were praised for their performance in creating “Asian Tigers” in the 1980s. This passion for seeing the future in other nation’s schools–once it was even Soviet schools–now has fixed upon Finnish schools.
Pasi Sahlberg is director of the Finnish Ministry of Education’s Center for International Mobility and author of the new book Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? He posted this sensible way of borrowing from another nation on his blog November 5, 2011.
“I think the first lesson that Finland offers to other educational reformers is that whole-system reform can be successful only if it is inspiring to all involved and thereby energizes people to work together for intended improvement. I often use the thinking of Martin Luther King as an example of an inspiring dream that moves people. Dr. King’s dream was not that his country would have a 5-percent annual economic growth rate. That wouldn’t have inspired many people. Similarly, making a country number one in PISA rankings doesn’t excite too many educators. The Finnish Dream since the 1970s has been to provide a good public school for every child in the country. This goal inspired many and was a source of energy that was needed to push through necessary political and educational changes. It was powerful enough to bring different people and political groups to join forces for fulfillment of this dream. The Finnish Dream looks like the dream of John F. Kennedy in 1961: to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade. It was challenging, required hard work and political consensus, but in the end rewarded the entire nation through its outcomes.
Second, some observers have concluded that the secret of Finnish educational success is its well-trained teachers. Yes, it is true that teachers and leaders have higher academic education in Finland than in many other countries. But that alone is not the way to whole-system change. What is significant in the Finnish approach is that it has focused on improving the professional knowledge and skills of teachers and leaders as a collective group, not only as individuals, which is the common practice in many current reform programs elsewhere. Finnish teachers learn to work together with other teachers. Finnish education system development has systematically focused on improving schools as social organizations. This includes leadership development that is, according to external reviewers, aimed at enhancing shared and distributed models of leadership. In brief, Finnish educational change is driven by building social capital within the system in concert with individual professional growth.
Third, I think the Finnish example – together with lessons from Canada, Singapore, Japan and Korea – of successful transformation of an education system shows other countries what could be the wrong drivers in educational change…. In my book Finnish Lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in Finland? I talk about the Global Educational Reform Movement (GERM) that has been much less successful than what Finland and the other successful reformers mentioned above have been able to accomplish with almost the opposite solutions. The best-performing educational systems all have built their change strategies on systemic approaches that rely on collective professional and institutional (or social capital) development, enhanced conditions for teaching and learning for all and more equal educational opportunities within their education systems. Countries that have been infected by GERM drive their education reforms by piecemeal changes, stronger accountability for teachers, faith in individual capacity building, and the power of technology over humans as keys to turning around unsatisfactory school systems. Michael Fullan has argued that “there is no way that … nationwide goals will be met with the strategies being used” in the ongoing education reform in the U.S or Australia. “Finnish Lessons” suggests that these are not the right drivers for whole-system reforms. They have never been used in Finland or in any other successful education system as the main strategy of change.
We should not ask whether Finnish educational model would work in the United States or anywhere else. The question should be: What can we learn from the Finnish experience as high performer and successful reformer? The main lesson from Finland is that there is another way to transform current education systems than that based on standardization, testing, accountability and competition. Finland also shows that we don’t need to rely on corporate school reform models to achieve our goals. Finnish lesson is that good policies and overall well-being of people, including poverty reduction, are the corner stones of sustainable educational success.
Related articles
- What Americans Keep Ignoring About Finland’s School Success (m.theatlantic.com)
- From Finland, an Intriguing School-Reform Model (nytimes.com)
- Nice guys “Finnish” last? (matthew.wordpress.com)
- Washington Post: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2062465,00.html
This is indeed an excellent book. Perhaps your readers would enjoy my summary at http://bit.ly/taRzvF. I also published an article on what we can do now in the US based on what we can learn from this book. Here is the link ow.ly/8y9AR. Keep up the good work.
“What is significant in the Finnish approach is that it has focused on improving the professional knowledge and skills of teachers and leaders as a collective group, not only as individuals, which is the common practice in many current reform programs elsewhere.”
Hmmm… I’m wondering how Finnish teacher training focuses on teachers and leaders as a collective group rather than individuals. I’m guessing that I would have to get Pasi Sahlberg’s book to figure that out
.
I’m asking because I do see some cooperation between teachers at the school that I’m student teaching at. For example, every Friday, the 3rd class that I’m in goes to a kindergarten class for 30 minutes. Each of the 3rd graders read books out loud to each of the kindergartners.
Pingback: A “Round-Up” Of Recent Good School Reform Posts & Articles | Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…
Larry, I agree completely with Sahlberg’s rejection of, “faith in …the power of technology over humans as keys to turning around unsatisfactory school systems.”
I was in Finland only a few months ago and learned a great deal, although not quite what I expected to learn. For what it’s worth, this is something I wrote on my own blog at the time.
Here, in Finland, they have made teaching into a confident, skilled profession. All the teachers I have met, chatted with and questioned have impressed me as excellent professionals who know what they are doing. And because of that, they drive everything from the top down. It doesn’t really surprise me that they can build superb schools buildings and facilities because they are consistent in their views, they understand what effective teaching and learning truly is and how to make it happen. Something for UK policy makers and others to seriously try and understand, when they lavish praise on the Finnish education system.
Thanks, Joe, for your observations on Finnish teachers and education.
Thank you for sharing this.
It reminded me of a piece I read in The Toronto Star a while back (both because of the current fondness of all things Finnish, and also for the reflection on how we might improve). The piece seems to focus more on what is going on in Finnish schools outside of the classroom–but in the school–as a starting point for improvement.
The series is here: http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/960546–saving-public-education-why-teachers-matter
Thanks, Stevan, for pointing me to the Toronto Star piece on that 6th grade teacher and Finnish schools.
Pingback: Kassblog » PLN Picks for the Week
Pingback: What Can the U.S. Learn from Educational Change in Finland? (Pasi Sahlberg) | Dijital Yaşayanlar vs Analog Algılar | Scoop.it